Archive for the ‘Claims’ Category
One of the most difficult parts of DSHEA to comprehend is the difference between all of the claims that are made, what we can say, what we can’t say, when the disclaimer is required, and so forth.
The first thing that we need to do is understand the difference between the different “claims”.
Health Claims (aka Disease Claims)
Qualified Health Claims
Nutrient Content Claims
Structure / Function claim: This is where we get in to those “promotes healthy bowel movements” type statements. We can’t fix diarrhea, but we can promote healthy bowel movements. Say it loud, say it proud, we can promote healthy bowel movements! But don’t forget to say it to the FDA too, before 30 days have passed.
They want to know what structure / function claims are being made. You don’t have to prove your claims are true, but they do require that you can maintain some sort of proof on file just in case the subject should come up at a later date. Specifically the “substantiation” that needs to be kept on file is that your claims are truthful and not misleading.
Structure / Function claims don’t seem to be too difficult to come up with. The hard part is avoiding disease claims while making your product’s label or marketing materials compelling. So, let’s get clear on what a disease claim is.
The FDA uses the NLEA (Nutrition Labeling and Education Act) definition of “disease or health related condition”.
damage to an organ, part, structure, or system of the body such that it does not function properly (e.g., cardiovascular disease), or a state of health leading to such dysfunctioning (e.g., hypertension); except that diseases resulting from essential nutrient deficiencies (e.g., scurvy, pellagra) are not included in this definition
Summary: the FDA has set aside a few conditions that, while considered temporarily inconvenient, are not considered a disease. The complete list is found lower on this page.
Are there any exceptions to these disease claim issues?
Of course, it works like this. If you are claiming to help with something that may be no big deal or in fact could be a big deal, the tie goes to the runner, which in this case is us!
Whenever you make a structure / function claim, you have to add a disclaimer that explains how the claim has not been evaluated by the FDA, and that it isn’t supposed to treat a disease.
The actual disclaimer reads as the following:
This statement has not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.
Summary: free speech allows one to make any statement about the actions of an herbal formula that are accurate and truthful. However, when those statements are associated with an adjacent purchase opportunity such as a “buy now” button on a web page, the statement becomes a “claim”.
There are plenty of places where you can make claims that need to comply with DSHEA standards.
The first is kind of obvious, that’s the bottle’s label or the packaging in which the herbs are found.
Next we have any papers, advertisements, coupons, or other materials packaged with your supplement that you sell, mail, provide, or otherwise get to the consumer. All of these things are considered “labeling”, but it doesn’t stop there.
This page articulates the various situations in which the FDA is going to consider labeling a disease claim. Keep in mind too that even with what you see on this page, the FDA guidance keeps mentioning “context” in regards to how they read a claim. There’s more on that later.
I call these non-compliant workarounds. The most obvious attempt to circumvent the disease claim rule is by giving a formula a name that implies a treatment for a disease such as “Tumor-Shrink”. Although the name of a formula isn’t a claim, the attempt to make a claim is obvious. What follows on this page are the various ways in which hard working folks like you and I try to work around the FDA’s rules. These are non-compliant, so don’t use these ideas, they won’t work. Get it?
Non-Compliant Workaround #1: claiming to treat a disease by replacing the disease name with slang or TCM syndrome names.
Summary: you don’t have to mention a recognizable biomedical disease to be making a disease claim. Even TCM patterns in which something is wrong that that needs to be made right are considered diseases.
Non-Compliant Workaround #2: verbs or terms that describe the function of the formula that suggests the treatment of disease.
For instance, “Shen Ling Bai Zhu San to restore normal colon function” suggests that the colon’s function is in a diseased state and must be restored, and so this statement would be non-compliant. “Shen Ling Bai Zhu San to maintain healthy function of the colon” is okay. “Shen Ling Bai Zhu San to prevent diarrhea” is non-compliant. Treating, curing, preventing or mitigating disease is something that only drugs can do, not dietary supplements.
Non-Compliant Workaround #3: implying a disease claim through the name of the product.
Summary: You can’t hide a disease claim in the name of a product. However, hiding a claim to treat a non-disease state is okay. Using those allowed structure/function terms is also compliant.